@Fr_Sotelo
This article seems to me to be yet another “hit piece” indicating the then Cardinal was too busy worrying about doctrinal errors (of which the NYT seems to be dismissive of) to worry about the sexual abuse.
This one seems to paint him as neglectfully aloof, intolerant and the like.
It also seeks to continue the insinuations that the now Pope had to have known about the transfer.
So I would hardly call it more factual.
Link to article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/world/europe/28church.html
